TRACE FORENSIC EXPERTS LLC
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation >
      • Breach of Contract
      • Economic Damages
      • Partnership disputes
    • Fraud & White Collar Crime >
      • Due Diligence
      • Internal Investigations
      • Construction Fraud
      • Asset Recovery
      • Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Divorce and Child Support
    • FORENSIC DATA ANALYTICS >
      • Vendor & Procurement Fraud Analytics
      • Legal Spend Optimization
    • Information Governance and e-Discovery >
      • Early Case Assessment
      • AI Driven Medical Record Review
  • Leadership
  • News and Insights
    • In The News >
      • July 28, 2022 Press Release
      • October 18, 2022 Press Release
      • January 31, 2023 Press Release
    • TRACE Forensic Newsletters >
      • Volume 4 April 2023
      • Volume 3 December 2022
      • Volume 2 October 2022
      • Volume 1 August 2022
    • Blog
    • Trace on the Case
  • TRACE Partners
  • FAQ's
  • Contact

case study

A technology company with over $5 billion  in annual spend  and 16,000 vendors wanted to identify potential overpayments made  to vendors. They also wanted to identify potential risks in their accounts payable process. The company’s internal audit team had already red-flagged some vendors,  which raised concerns with executive management. Along with identifying overpayments, the client also wanted to automate identification of risk areas and unusual activity going forward.

Approach
Picture
Selective Findings

  • A large number of inactive vendors in the vendor master who were not been paid in the last 24 months.
  • Multiple vendors receiving payments without Tax-Id populated in Vendor Master.
  • Quantity variances identified between PO / Invoice and Delivery documents.
  • Price variances between different vendors supplying the same product to the company.
  • Large price variances of the same products sold by the same vendor to different teams within the company.
  • Duplicate invoices paid due to a process error in the firm’s duplicate invoice identification methodology.
  • Vendors charging more and being paid than the contracted amount.
  • Vendors not complying with contract terms by not awarding bulk discounts or paying rebates for bulk purchases.
  • Vendors not meeting contracted SLA terms.

Outcome & Deliverables
  • Risk assessment of vendor payment processes.
  • Recovery of over $5M from vendor overpayments.
  • Vendor and payment risk profile dashboard for management.
  • Recommendations for mitigating identified risks.
  • Development of training material for employees to prevent and detect future losses through overpayment. 


  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation >
      • Breach of Contract
      • Economic Damages
      • Partnership disputes
    • Fraud & White Collar Crime >
      • Due Diligence
      • Internal Investigations
      • Construction Fraud
      • Asset Recovery
      • Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Divorce and Child Support
    • FORENSIC DATA ANALYTICS >
      • Vendor & Procurement Fraud Analytics
      • Legal Spend Optimization
    • Information Governance and e-Discovery >
      • Early Case Assessment
      • AI Driven Medical Record Review
  • Leadership
  • News and Insights
    • In The News >
      • July 28, 2022 Press Release
      • October 18, 2022 Press Release
      • January 31, 2023 Press Release
    • TRACE Forensic Newsletters >
      • Volume 4 April 2023
      • Volume 3 December 2022
      • Volume 2 October 2022
      • Volume 1 August 2022
    • Blog
    • Trace on the Case
  • TRACE Partners
  • FAQ's
  • Contact